Please don't make your loyal customers have to do that. I'm proud to put Midwest Industries products on my rifles, and I'll continue to buy the gear you make, but truthfully if someone makes the rail that you won't, I will have to buy it from them. In closing, Come 'on, give in a little bit, I promise you'll be very happy once you do. It can be done, reasonably and inexpensively, with a little creative engineering, which I know you guys possess. Once you guys can fix that receiver gap to rail issue you will sell a metric shit ton more rail systems being sold. So why skimp on the aesthetics? I don't think you are a company that would follow the philosophy of "we'll make it almost just right".
I have a decent amount of MI gear, I dig the company, and your products are top notch. Ignoring the concern we have over it is the wrong answer, and frankly it doesn't look good on your end. Please do it, and charge extra if you will, but don't just write it off as it being not worth it. I think you are being too dismissive about the gap. Thanks MI for continuing to produce high quality AK handguards, I've been holding out for the keymod version for awhile, and will pick up a few of the extended when they become available. I could care less if there was some kind of square butt plug on this handguard to fit into the receiver, it would only be cosmetic.I prefer things to be functional. If you (dragynn) think there are zero reasons to put an aftermarket rail on, in place of the stock handguards, you are delusional. If it was a moot point, there would be zero reasons to buy an aftermarket product that costs in excess of 150-170 bucks, we'd just keep the factory furniture, (that actually fits). Once a panel is put the the rear position if your hand goes there its a mute point. Not as easy as you guys make it out to be.
Machine it with it having a round profile up front.
0 kommentar(er)
